The controversies surrounding the healthy hunger free kids act hhka program

It is worthwhile, though, for policymakers and program administrators to continue to evaluate the negative consequences associated with this change, especially since these consequences are most likely to be borne by children in low-income families.

School Meals

This is consistent with a study that showed a marked decline in milk consumption after flavored milk was removed from some school meal programs due to the perceived negative characteristics of flavored milk and, as a consequence, the health benefits associated with milk consumption were not realized.

Provides resources to increase nutritional quality of food provided by USDA Sets minimum standards for school wellness policies Limits milk served to nonfat flavored milk or 1 percent white milk [12] Reduced portion sizes in meals Mandate a minimum on fruit, vegetables, and whole grain servings Mandate a maximum sodium, sugar, and fat content Increases access[ edit ] Increased the number of eligible children for school meal programs by ,00 Uses census data to determine student need in high-poverty areas, rather than relying on paper applications.

Third, for many students, the main meal they eat might be lunch due to limited food availability at home. Second, children may be less likely to eat what is served through the revised guidelines and, hence, a decline in the receipt of school meals.

Retrieved January 12, Second, research has examined the impact of NSLP participation on childhood obesity. Children with sufficient food at home can make up for the reductions in calories of the new school lunches but this is not an option for many low-income children.

The proposals implemented through the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of have the potential to reduce the effectiveness of the NSLP in improving the well-being of low-income children.

On the surface, this restructuring of the NSLP seems like a good idea. First, there is evidence that persons will compensate for the loss of calories in one meal with additional calories in other meals. Inapproximately 30 million students participated in NSLP and over 70 percent of these participants received free or reduced price meals.

Retrieved 13 February There are some in the United States who may be willing to accept more hunger among children if this were paired with a decline in childhood obesity.

Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010

Despite the proven benefits associated with NSLP participation, the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of called for a total restructuring of the standards of the program. The NSLP operates in overpublic and nonprofit private schools across the United States and, in the process, has the potential to reach almost all children attending school.

First, children who receive free or reduced-price lunches are between 2. If these children are being given even healthier meals through sack lunches or through consumption of foods at local retail food outlets, this may then mean these children would not be at higher risk of obesity.

The video complained of its students being "hungry" and not fed well enough to participate in their extracurricular activities or sports due to reduced portion sizes relative to those prior to the new law. United States Department of Agriculture. Department of Agriculture USDA to make significant changes to the school lunch program for the first time in over 30 years.

After all, who is against healthier meals? However, concerns exist regarding what might happen to childhood hunger in the United States due to these new rules.

The experts also explained that eating calories at lunch is enough for most high schoolers. But, if their sack lunches or alternative outside-school meal options are not healthier, they could be at higher risk of obesity.

Research suggests that rural children are more likely to be overweight or obese when compared to urban children, the diets of rural children are less nutritious and their families have less access to healthy food, leading into the next reason of benefiting children facing obesity.

The author acknowledges the excellent assistance of Stephanie Boas and financial support from the U. First, schools are faced with higher expenses due to these requirements and declines in participation among students and, hence, fewer meals sold.

This research is especially instructive insofar as at least some people believe that the NSLP is associated with increases in childhood obesity.

For more, visit http: Food Research and Action Center In some cases, schools in high-poverty areas can provide free school lunches to all children without the requirement of family incomes. Research has foundthough, that low-income participants in the NSLP are no more likely than eligible non-participants to be obese or overweight.

The Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids act of does appear to be a well-intentioned policy change. The main aspects are listed below. The energy density ration was 1.

Provides resources for schools and communities to utilize local farms and gardens to provide fresh produce. The following are three probable consequences of the policy changes for consideration.1 Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act ofS.th Cong. (), available at ultimedescente.com ultimedescente.com 2 The fact sheets can be found at: ultimedescente.com 3 42 U.S.C.

(r)(5) (). Hungry Vs. Healthy: The School Lunch Controversy. There’s a new plate in town and it’s being served with side of complaints.

The Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of authorizes funding for federal school meal and child nutrition programs and increases access to healthy food for low-income children. The bill that. Program and School Breakfast Program, and also apply to all food available a la carte, in vending machines, at snack bars, and at other school locations.

Q What will the USDA use in 1 Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act ofS.th Cong. ().

Access Denied

The National School Lunch Program (NSLP) is a core component of the social safety net for low-income children in the United States. The proposals implemented through the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of have the potential to reduce the effectiveness of the NSLP in improving the well-being of low-income children.

The Potentially Negative Consequences Associated with the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act

Improving child nutrition is the focal point of the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of The legislation authorized funding and set policy for USDA's core child nutrition programs: the National School Lunch Program, the School Breakfast Program, the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC), the Summer .

Download
The controversies surrounding the healthy hunger free kids act hhka program
Rated 3/5 based on 41 review